The patch below adds a comment about why it is safe to use in_atomic() in
authorvlnb <vlnb@d57e44dd-8a1f-0410-8b47-8ef2f437770f>
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:01:28 +0000 (19:01 +0000)
committervlnb <vlnb@d57e44dd-8a1f-0410-8b47-8ef2f437770f>
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:01:28 +0000 (19:01 +0000)
commit995eae3e7ddecb1150ada428297584111bdc66b5
tree58cebf2366da4913ece408803eea04e142e7470d
parentb0cd2297fc1cfa1dae9d12f7f35a14c6266ce6c6
The patch below adds a comment about why it is safe to use in_atomic() in
scst_cmd_atomic() -- the 2.6.29 checkpatch script issues a warning about it.
At the same time, the scst_cmd_atomic() comment has been converted to
kernel-doc style. See also Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt for more
information.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: https://scst.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/scst/trunk@723 d57e44dd-8a1f-0410-8b47-8ef2f437770f
scst/include/scst.h